Get one quick Python tip each week
**Weekly Python advice**: one quick Python tip every week

Series: Generator Expressions

Let's talk about the `map`

and `filter`

functions in Python, the differences between them, and why I don't usually recommend using them (related: I also don't recommend lambda expressions).

`map`

function transforms each itemThe `map`

function accepts a function and an iterable.
Here we're passing a `square`

function and a `numbers`

list to `map`

:

```
>>> def square(n):
... return n**2
...
>>> numbers = [2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18]
>>> squared_numbers = map(square, numbers)
```

The `map`

function returns a **lazy iterable**:

```
>>> squared_numbers
<map object at 0x7f241e1f47f0>
```

As we loop over this `map`

object (`squared_numbers`

), the `map`

object will loop over the given iterable (`numbers`

) and call the given function (`square`

) on each item in the iterable, giving us back the return value of that function call:

```
>>> list(squared_numbers)
[4, 1, 9, 16, 49, 121, 324]
```

In this case, our `map`

object is squaring each of numbers in the given `numbers`

iterable.

You can think of `map`

as doing a **transformation** operation.
The `map`

function:

- Takes an iterable
- Takes an operation to perform on each item in the iterable
- Performs the given operation on each item as we loop over it

`filter`

function filters items downThe `filter`

function also accepts a function and an iterable.
We're an `is_odd`

function and a `numbers`

list to `filter`

:

```
>>> def is_odd(n):
... return n%2 == 1
...
>>> numbers = [2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18]
>>> odd_numbers = filter(is_odd, numbers)
```

Like `map`

, the `filter`

function gives us back a *lazy iterable*:

```
>>> odd_numbers
<filter object at 0x7fbf13c1d7c0>
```

As we loop over this `filter`

object (`odd_numbers`

), the `filter`

object will loop over the given iterable (`numbers`

), and call the given function (`is_odd`

) on each item in it.
However, it **doesn't give us back the return value of that function call**; instead it uses that function call to **determine whether that item should be included in the resulting lazy iterable**:

```
>>> list(odd_numbers)
[1, 3, 7, 11]
```

In this case, we're only getting odd numbers, because the `filter`

function will only include items where `True`

(or a truthy value) is returned when that item is passed to the given function (`is_odd`

in our case).

`map`

and `filter`

are equivalent to writing a generator expression- The
`map`

function takes each item in a given iterable and and**includes all of them**in a new lazy iterable,**transforming**each item along the way - The
`filter`

function**doesn't transform the items**, but it's**selectively picks out**which items it should include in the new lazy iterable

The reason I don't usually recommend using `map`

and `filter`

is that **they can each be summed up in just one line of Python code**.

The `map`

function is nearly equivalent to this generator expression:

```
def map(function, iterable):
return (function(x) for x in iterable)
```

There's *a little bit more* to the `map`

function that this, but for most use cases `map`

is *essentially the same* as a generator expression that loops over an iterable and **calls a function on every item** in that iterable (to transform each item).

The `filter`

function is essentially the same as this generator expression:

```
def filter(function, iterable):
return (x for x in iterable if function(x))
```

This generator expression loops over an iterable and calls a function on each item **in the conditional part** of the generator expression to determine whether the items should be included in the new lazy iterable.

`map`

and `filter`

calls vs generator expressionsWe have `square`

and `is_odd`

functions here:

```
>>> def square(n):
... return n**2
...
>>> def is_odd(n):
... return n%2 == 1
```

And we have a list, `numbers`

:

```
>>> numbers = [2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18]
```

We could use the `map`

and `filter`

functions to take numbers and square all of the odd numbers (that is, only including odd numbers and squaring each included number).

We could pass `is_odd`

and `numbers`

to the `filter`

function and then take the `filter`

object we get back (which is a lazy iterable) and pass it to `map`

along with the `square`

function:

```
>>> numbers = [2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18]
>>> map(square, filter(is_odd, numbers))
<map object at 0x7ff0b70ef1c0>
```

This makes a lazy iterable which will include squares of all of the odd numbers in our list.

As we loop over the lazy `map`

object we get back, we'll see that it includes the square of all the odd numbers from our original list:

```
>>> list(map(square, filter(is_odd, numbers)))
[1, 9, 49, 121]
```

We could accomplish this same task using a generator expression, like this:

```
>>> (square(n) for n in numbers if is_odd(n))
<generator object <genexpr> at 0x7ff0b710aba0>
```

Though if we wanted to get a list instead of a lazy iterable, we could write it as a list comprehension instead:

```
>>> [square(n) for n in numbers if is_odd(n)]
[1, 9, 49, 121]
```

I find this list comprehension (or generator expression) version a lot more readable than the equivalent `map`

and `filter`

version of the same code:

```
>>> list(map(square, filter(is_odd, numbers)))
[1, 9, 49, 121]
```

The `map`

and `filter`

version is a little bit inside-out looking: we pass a function (`square`

) to `map`

along with a `filter`

object which has a function (`is_odd`

) and an iterable (`numbers`

) passed to it.

Whereas the list comprehension version looks more like the English sentence I might say in order to describe the operation we're performing:

```
>>> [square(n) for n in numbers if is_odd(n)]
[1, 9, 49, 121]
```

In fact, with the generator expression or list comprehension, you don't even need extra functions to call (unlike with `map`

and `filter`

).
You can write out the operations (`n**2`

and `if n % 2 == 1`

) right inside the first part and last part of a list comprehension (or generator expression):

```
>>> [n**2 for n in numbers if n % 2 == 1]
[1, 9, 49, 121]
```

In fact, I think of **the first part** of a generator expression is **the mapping part**, and **the last part** of a generator expression as **the filtering part** because they serve the same purpose as the built-in `map`

and `filter`

functions.

The `map`

function performs **a transformation on each item in an iterable**, returning a lazy iterable back.
The `filter`

function **filters down items in an iterable**, returning a lazy iterable back.

Instead of `map`

and `filter`

, I tend to prefer generator expressions.
The first part of a generator expression as the mapping part, and the last optional part of a generator expression (the condition) as the filtering part.

Need to **fill-in gaps** in your Python skills?

Sign up for my Python newsletter where **I share one of my favorite Python tips every week**.

List comprehensions make new lists. Generator expressions make new generator objects. Generators are iterators, which are lazy single-use iterables. Unlike lists, generators aren't data structures. Instead they do work *as you loop over them*.

To track your progress on this Python Morsels topic trail, sign in or sign up.

✕

↑

A Python Tip Every Week

Need to **fill-in gaps** in your **Python skills**? I send weekly emails designed to do just that.